§ 03 Head to head

Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens vs Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro

Mitakon 85mm f/2.8 has a wider field of view. Tamron 90mm f/2.8 has a longer reach.

Both lenses are made for the Canon EF mount: the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens is an 85mm f/2.8 prime, and the Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro is a 90mm f/2.8 prime. On paper the Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro comes out ahead, 4 advantages to 3, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens better than the Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro?

  • Wider field of view (85mm vs 90mm)
  • Focuses 19 cm closer (0.1 m vs 0.29 m)
  • Newer design (2019 vs 1997)

Why is the Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro better than the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens?

  • Longer reach (90mm vs 85mm)
  • 330 g lighter (420 g vs 750 g)
  • 48 mm shorter (74 mm vs 122 mm long)
  • Smaller filter thread (55 mm vs 58 mm)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • macro For macro photography, the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.1 m.
  • portrait For portrait photography, the Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro has the edge: it is 330 g lighter to carry.
03

Specification

15 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationMitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro LensTamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro
Focal length85mm 90mm
Maximum aperturef/2.8 f/2.8
Minimum aperturef/32 f/32
Lens typePrime lens Prime lens
FormatFull frame Full frame
Weight750 g (26.46 oz) 420 g ◆
Dimensions67 x 122 mm 97 x 74 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.10 m (3.94 inches) ◆0.29 m
Image stabilizationNo No
Aperture ring—No
Aperture blades9 9
Optical construction12 elements / 8 groups 10 elements / 9 groups
Filter size58 mm 55 mm ◆
Lens mountCanon EF, Nikon F, Sony A, Pentax K, Sony E, Micro Four Thirds, Fujifilm X, Canon EF-M Canon EF, Nikon F, Sony A, Pentax K
Released2019 1997
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Mitakon
  • B · Tamron
  • 122 × 67 mm
  • 74 × 97 mm

The Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens is 48 mm longer and 330 g heavier than the Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens

1x @F/2.8 handheld
1x @F/2.8 handheld by hlaville
5x @F/4 handheld
5x @F/4 handheld by hlaville
Empis (Mitakon 85mm F2.8 1-5x super macro)
Empis (Mitakon 85mm F2.8 1-5x super macro) by hlaville
5:1
5:1 by hlaville

Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro

Pine Toad
Pine Toad by fjmn36
Plumetop
Plumetop by fjmn36
2026 05 25_d5300_0053
2026 05 25_d5300_0053 by swedgatch
20260726-_8506501
20260726-_8506501 by Shot by Nitya
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens review 1
Video thumbnail for Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens review 2
Video thumbnail for Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro review 1
Video thumbnail for Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro review 2
07

Questions

Which is lighter, the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens or the Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro?
The Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro weighs 420 g, 330 g less than the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens (750 g).
Which focuses closer, the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens or the Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro?
The Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens focuses down to 0.1 m, against 0.29 m for the Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro.
Do the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens and the Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro have image stabilization?
No, neither lens has optical image stabilization; rely on in-body stabilization if your camera has it.
Is the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens or the Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro better for macro photography?
For macro photography, the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.1 m.
Is the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens or the Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro better for portrait photography?
For portrait photography, the Tamron SP AF 90 mm f/2.8 Macro has the edge: it is 330 g lighter to carry.
08

Other comparisons