§ 03 Head to head

Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro vs Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens

Fujifilm 80mm f/2.8 has a wider field of view. Mitakon 85mm f/2.8 has a longer reach.

The Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro is an 80mm f/2.8 prime, and the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens is an 85mm f/2.8 prime. On paper the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens comes out ahead, 6 advantages to 2, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro better than the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens?

  • Wider field of view (80mm vs 85mm)
  • Has optical image stabilization

Why is the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens better than the Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro?

  • Longer reach (85mm vs 80mm)
  • 8 mm shorter (122 mm vs 130 mm long)
  • Focuses 15 cm closer (0.1 m vs 0.25 m)
  • Smaller filter thread (58 mm vs 62 mm)
  • Covers a larger sensor format (full-frame vs APS-C)
  • Newer design (2019 vs 2017)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • macro For macro photography, the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.1 m.
03

Specification

17 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationFujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR MacroMitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens
Focal length80mm 85mm
Maximum aperturef/2.8 f/2.8
Minimum aperturef/22 f/32
Lens typeMacro prime lens Prime lens
FormatAPS-C Full frame
Weight750 g (26.5 oz) 750 g (26.46 oz)
Dimensions80 mm (diameter) x 130 mm (length) 67 x 122 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.25 m (9.8 inches) 0.10 m (3.94 inches) ◆
Maximum magnification1.0x —
Image stabilizationYes (Optical Image Stabilization) ◆No
Weather sealingYes —
Aperture ringYes —
Aperture blades9 (rounded) 9
Optical construction16 elements in 12 groups (includes 1 aspherical, 3 ED, and 1 Super ED elements) 12 elements / 8 groups
Filter size62 mm 58 mm ◆
Lens mountFujifilm X Canon EF, Nikon F, Sony A, Pentax K, Sony E, Micro Four Thirds, Fujifilm X, Canon EF-M
Released2017 2019
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Fujifilm
  • B · Mitakon
  • 130 × 80 mm
  • 122 × 67 mm

The Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro is 8 mm longer than the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro

Farfalla. ( Coenonympha Pamphilius )
Farfalla. ( Coenonympha Pamphilius ) by luigivalbusa
Bacche.
Bacche. by luigivalbusa
Insetto.
Insetto. by luigivalbusa
053x
053x by DomMartel

Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens

1x @F/2.8 handheld
1x @F/2.8 handheld by hlaville
5x @F/4 handheld
5x @F/4 handheld by hlaville
Empis (Mitakon 85mm F2.8 1-5x super macro)
Empis (Mitakon 85mm F2.8 1-5x super macro) by hlaville
5:1
5:1 by hlaville
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro review 1
Video thumbnail for Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro review 2
Video thumbnail for Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens review 1
Video thumbnail for Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens review 2
07

Questions

Which focuses closer, the Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro or the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens?
The Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens focuses down to 0.1 m, against 0.25 m for the Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro.
Do the Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro and the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens have image stabilization?
Only the Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro has optical image stabilization.
Is the Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro or the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens better for macro photography?
For macro photography, the Mitakon 85 mm f/2.8 1-5X Super Macro Lens has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.1 m.
08

Other comparisons