§ 03 Head to head

Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 vs Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM

Irix 150mm f/2.8 has a wider field of view. Sigma 180mm f/2.8 has a longer reach.

The Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 is a 150mm f/2.8 prime, and the Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM is an 180mm f/2.8 prime. On paper the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 comes out ahead, 7 advantages to 2, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 better than the Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM?

  • Wider field of view (150mm vs 180mm)
  • 533 g lighter (1105 g vs 1638 g)
  • 68 mm shorter (136 mm vs 203.9 mm long)
  • Focuses 12 cm closer (0.35 m vs 0.47 m)
  • Has a physical aperture ring
  • More aperture blades (11 vs 9)
  • Newer design (2019 vs 2012)

Why is the Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM better than the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1?

  • Longer reach (180mm vs 150mm)
  • Has optical image stabilization
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • macro For macro photography, the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.35 m.
03

Specification

16 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationIrix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM
Focal length150mm 180mm
Maximum aperturef/2.8 f/2.8
Minimum aperturef/32 f/22
Lens typeCinema lens Prime lens
FormatFull frame Full frame
Weight1105 g ◆1638 g (57.78 oz)
Dimensions136 x 97 mm 203.9 x 95 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.35 m (13.78 inches) ◆0.47 m (18.50 inches)
Image stabilizationNo Yes ◆
Weather sealingYes —
Aperture ringYes No
Aperture blades11 ◆9
Optical construction12 elements / 9 groups 19 elements / 14 groups
Filter size86 mm 86 mm
Lens mountCanon EF, Micro Four Thirds, Sony E, PL, Canon RF, Nikon Z, L-Mount Canon EF, Nikon F, Sigma SA
Released2019 2012
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Irix
  • B · Sigma
  • 136 × 97 mm
  • 203.9 × 95 mm

The Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM is 68 mm longer and 533 g heavier than the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM

Grote weerschijnvlinder - Purple Emperor - Großer Schillerfalter - Grand Mars changeant - Apatura iris
Grote weerschijnvlinder - Purple Emperor - Großer Schillerfalter - Grand Mars changeant - Apatura iris by RJSchutDigitaal
Common Buttonbush
Common Buttonbush by nikomelos
Eastern Comma
Eastern Comma by nikomelos
Rustic Roadside
Rustic Roadside by wjserson
06

Video reviews

3 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 review 1
Video thumbnail for Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 review 2
Video thumbnail for Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM review 1
07

Questions

Which is lighter, the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 or the Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM?
The Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 weighs 1105 g, 533 g less than the Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM (1638 g).
Which focuses closer, the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 or the Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM?
The Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 focuses down to 0.35 m, against 0.47 m for the Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM.
Do the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 and the Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM have image stabilization?
Only the Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM has optical image stabilization.
Is the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 or the Sigma 180 mm f/2.8 APO Macro EX DG OS HSM better for macro photography?
For macro photography, the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.35 m.
08

Other comparisons