§ 03 Head to head

Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 vs Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro

Irix 150mm f/2.8 is 75 g lighter. Sigma 150mm f/2.8 has optical image stabilization.

The Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 is a 150mm f/2.8 prime, and the Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro is a 150mm f/2.8 prime. On paper the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 comes out ahead, 6 advantages to 2, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 better than the Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro?

  • 75 g lighter (1105 g vs 1180 g)
  • 14 mm shorter (136 mm vs 150 mm long)
  • Focuses 3 cm closer (0.35 m vs 0.38 m)
  • Has a physical aperture ring
  • More aperture blades (11 vs 9)
  • Newer design (2019 vs 2010)

Why is the Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro better than the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1?

  • Has optical image stabilization
  • Smaller filter thread (72 mm vs 86 mm)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • macro For macro photography, the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.35 m.
03

Specification

16 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationIrix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro
Focal length150mm 150mm
Maximum aperturef/2.8 f/2.8
Minimum aperturef/32 f/22
Lens typeCinema lens Prime lens
FormatFull frame Full frame
Weight1105 g ◆1180 g (41.62 oz)
Dimensions136 x 97 mm 79.6 x 150 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.35 m (13.78 inches) ◆0.38 m (14.96 inches)
Image stabilizationNo Yes ◆
Weather sealingYes —
Aperture ringYes No
Aperture blades11 ◆9
Optical construction12 elements / 9 groups 19 elements / 13 groups
Filter size86 mm 72 mm ◆
Lens mountCanon EF, Micro Four Thirds, Sony E, PL, Canon RF, Nikon Z, L-Mount Canon EF, Nikon F, Sony A, Sigma SA, Pentax K, Four Thirds
Released2019 2010
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Irix
  • B · Sigma
  • 136 × 97 mm
  • 150 × 79.6 mm

The Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro is 14 mm longer and 75 g heavier than the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro

Rencontre du jour. - Encuentro de hoy
Rencontre du jour. - Encuentro de hoy by pierky photo nature
Sympetrum fonscolombii
Sympetrum fonscolombii by Jaume Bobet
Sympetrum fonscolombii
Sympetrum fonscolombii by Jaume Bobet
2026-365-283-11 octobre
2026-365-283-11 octobre by bebopeloula
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 review 1
Video thumbnail for Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 review 2
Video thumbnail for Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro review 1
Video thumbnail for Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro review 2
07

Questions

Which is lighter, the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 or the Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro?
The Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 weighs 1105 g, 75 g less than the Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro (1180 g).
Which focuses closer, the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 or the Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro?
The Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 focuses down to 0.35 m, against 0.38 m for the Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro.
Do the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 and the Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro have image stabilization?
Only the Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro has optical image stabilization.
Is the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 or the Sigma 150 mm f/2.8 APO EX DG OS HSM Macro better for macro photography?
For macro photography, the Irix Cine 150 mm T3.0 MACRO 1:1 has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.35 m.
08

Other comparisons