Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR § 03 Head to head
Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR vs Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro
Fujifilm 63mm f/2.8 has a longer reach. Laowa 55mm f/2.8 has a wider field of view.
The Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR is a 63mm f/2.8 prime, and the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro is a 55mm f/2.8 prime. On paper the Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR comes out ahead, 5 advantages to 4, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.
Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR 01
Key differences
Why is the Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR better than the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro?
- Longer reach (63mm vs 55mm)
- 940 g lighter (405 g vs 1345 g)
- 98 mm shorter (71 mm vs 168.5 mm long)
- Smaller filter thread (62 mm vs 77 mm)
- Covers a larger sensor format (medium-format vs full-frame)
Why is the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro better than the Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR?
- Wider field of view (55mm vs 63mm)
- Focuses 23 cm closer (0.27 m vs 0.5 m)
- More aperture blades (15 vs 9)
- Newer design (2024 vs 2017)
02
Which should you buy?
- portrait For portrait photography, the Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR has the edge: it is 940 g lighter to carry.
- macro For macro photography, the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.27 m.
03
Specification
| Specification | Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR | Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro |
|---|---|---|
| Focal length | 63mm | 55mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Minimum aperture | f/32 | f/22 |
| Lens type | Standard prime lens | Prime lens |
| Format | Medium format | Full frame |
| Weight | 405 g (14.3 oz) ◆ | 1345 g |
| Dimensions | 84 mm (diameter) x 71 mm (length) | 168.5 x 85 mm |
| Minimum focusing distance | 0.5 m (19.7 inches) | 0.27 m ◆ |
| Maximum magnification | 0.17x | — |
| Image stabilization | No | No |
| Weather sealing | Yes | — |
| Aperture ring | Yes | — |
| Aperture blades | 9 (rounded) | 15 ◆ |
| Optical construction | 10 elements in 8 groups (includes 1 extra-low dispersion element) | 14 elements / 11 groups |
| Filter size | 62 mm ◆ | 77 mm |
| Lens mount | Fujifilm G | Sony E, Nikon Z, Canon RF, Fujifilm G, L-Mount |
| Released | 2017 | 2024 |
| Price | — | $1,249 launch price |
04
Size
- A · Fujifilm
- B · Venus
- 71 × 84 mm
- 168.5 × 85 mm
The Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro is 97 mm longer and 940 g heavier than the Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR.
05
Sample frames
Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR
06
Video reviews
07
Questions
- Which is lighter, the Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR or the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro?
- The Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR weighs 405 g, 940 g less than the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro (1345 g).
- Which focuses closer, the Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR or the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro?
- The Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro focuses down to 0.27 m, against 0.5 m for the Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR.
- Do the Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR and the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro have image stabilization?
- No, neither lens has optical image stabilization; rely on in-body stabilization if your camera has it.
- Is the Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR or the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro better for portrait photography?
- For portrait photography, the Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR has the edge: it is 940 g lighter to carry.
- Is the Fujifilm GF 63mm F2.8 R WR or the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro better for macro photography?
- For macro photography, the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.27 m.
08



