§ 03 Head to head

Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR vs Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro

Fujifilm 50mm f/3.5 has a wider field of view. Laowa 55mm f/2.8 is 0.6 stops brighter maximum aperture.

The Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR is a 50mm f/3.5 prime, and the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro is a 55mm f/2.8 prime. On paper they trade blows, with 5 advantages each.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR better than the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro?

  • Wider field of view (50mm vs 55mm)
  • 1010 g lighter (335 g vs 1345 g)
  • 121 mm shorter (48 mm vs 168.5 mm long)
  • Smaller filter thread (62 mm vs 77 mm)
  • Covers a larger sensor format (medium-format vs full-frame)

Why is the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro better than the Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR?

  • 0.6 stops brighter maximum aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.5)
  • Longer reach (55mm vs 50mm)
  • Focuses 28 cm closer (0.27 m vs 0.55 m)
  • More aperture blades (15 vs 9)
  • Newer design (2024 vs 2019)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • portrait For portrait photography, the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro has the edge: its f/2.8 aperture gathers more light than f/3.5.
  • macro For macro photography, the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.27 m.
03

Specification

18 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationFujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WRVenus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro
Focal length50mm 55mm
Maximum aperturef/3.5 f/2.8 ◆
Minimum aperturef/32 f/22
Lens typeStandard prime lens Prime lens
FormatMedium Format Full frame
Weight335 g (11.8 oz) ◆1345 g
Dimensions84 mm (diameter) x 48 mm (length) 168.5 x 85 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.55 m (21.7 inches) 0.27 m ◆
Maximum magnification0.1x —
Image stabilizationNo No
Weather sealingYes —
Aperture ringYes —
Aperture blades9 (rounded) 15 ◆
Optical construction9 elements in 6 groups (includes 1 aspherical element) 14 elements / 11 groups
Filter size62 mm ◆77 mm
Lens mountFujifilm G Sony E, Nikon Z, Canon RF, Fujifilm G, L-Mount
Released2019 2024
Price—$1,249 launch price
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Fujifilm
  • B · Venus
  • 48 × 84 mm
  • 168.5 × 85 mm

The Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro is 120 mm longer and 1010 g heavier than the Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR

20250722_0003
20250722_0003 by ExPlr2
20250722_0026
20250722_0026 by ExPlr2
20250722_0031_02
20250722_0031_02 by ExPlr2
20250722_0002_01
20250722_0002_01 by ExPlr2
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR review 1
Video thumbnail for Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR review 2
Video thumbnail for Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro review 1
Video thumbnail for Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro review 2
07

Questions

Which lens has the brighter aperture, the Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR or the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro?
The Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro opens to f/2.8, against f/3.5 on the Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR, 0.6 stops brighter.
Which is lighter, the Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR or the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro?
The Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR weighs 335 g, 1010 g less than the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro (1345 g).
Which focuses closer, the Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR or the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro?
The Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro focuses down to 0.27 m, against 0.55 m for the Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR.
Do the Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR and the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro have image stabilization?
No, neither lens has optical image stabilization; rely on in-body stabilization if your camera has it.
Is the Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR or the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro better for portrait photography?
For portrait photography, the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro has the edge: its f/2.8 aperture gathers more light than f/3.5.
Is the Fujifilm GF 50mm F3.5 R LM WR or the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro better for macro photography?
For macro photography, the Venus Optics LAOWA 55 mm f/2.8 Tilt-Shift 1x Macro has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.27 m.
08

Other comparisons