§ 03 Head to head

Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS vs Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF

Sigma 200mm f/2 has optical image stabilization. Laowa 200mm f/2 is 232 g lighter.

The Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS is a 200mm f/2 prime, and the Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF is a 200mm f/2 prime. On paper the Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF comes out ahead, 3 advantages to 2, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS better than the Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF?

  • Has optical image stabilization
  • More aperture blades (11 vs 9)

Why is the Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF better than the Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS?

  • 232 g lighter (1588 g vs 1820 g)
  • 24 mm shorter (176.8 mm vs 201 mm long)
  • Focuses 20 cm closer (1.5 m vs 1.7 m)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • wildlife For wildlife photography, the Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS has the edge: it has optical image stabilization.
  • low-light For low-light shooting, the Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS has the edge: it has optical image stabilization.
03

Specification

18 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationSigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OSVenus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF
Focal length200mm 200mm
Maximum aperturef/2 f/2
Minimum aperturef/22 f/22
Lens typeTelephoto lens Prime lens
FormatFull frame Full frame
Weight1820 g (64.27 oz) 1588 g ◆
Dimensions201 x 118.9 mm 176.8 x 118 mm
Minimum focusing distance1.70 m (5.58 ft) 1.5 m ◆
Maximum magnification0.13x —
Image stabilizationYes ◆No
Weather sealingYes —
Aperture ringNo No
Aperture blades11 ◆9
Optical construction19 elements / 14 groups 11 elements / 9 groups
Filter size105 mm 105 mm
Lens mountSony E, L-Mount Canon EF, Sony E, Nikon Z
Released2025 2025
Price$3,299 list price —
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Sigma
  • B · Venus
  • 201 × 118.9 mm
  • 176.8 × 118 mm

The Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS is 24 mm longer and 232 g heavier than the Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS

ROCAF Dassault Mirage-2000-5
ROCAF Dassault Mirage-2000-5 by oliver911
ROCAF Dassault Mirage-2000-5
ROCAF Dassault Mirage-2000-5 by oliver911
Sigma 200 2 DG OS Sports
Sigma 200 2 DG OS Sports by dariuszbres.pl
Sigma 200 2 DG OS Sports
Sigma 200 2 DG OS Sports by dariuszbres.pl
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS review 1
Video thumbnail for Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS review 2
Video thumbnail for Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF review 1
Video thumbnail for Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF review 2
07

Questions

Which is lighter, the Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS or the Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF?
The Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF weighs 1588 g, 232 g less than the Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS (1820 g).
Which focuses closer, the Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS or the Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF?
The Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF focuses down to 1.5 m, against 1.7 m for the Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS.
Do the Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS and the Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF have image stabilization?
Only the Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS has optical image stabilization.
Is the Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS or the Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF better for wildlife photography?
For wildlife photography, the Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS has the edge: it has optical image stabilization.
Is the Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS or the Venus Optics LAOWA 200 mm f/2 AF FF better for low-light shooting?
For low-light shooting, the Sigma S 200 mm f/2 DG OS has the edge: it has optical image stabilization.
08

Other comparisons