§ 03 Head to head

Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN vs Viltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH

Sigma 20mm f/2 is 438 g lighter. Viltrox 20mm f/2 has a more aperture blades.

The Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN is a 20mm f/2 prime, and the Viltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH is a 20mm f/2 prime. On paper the Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN comes out ahead, 5 advantages to 1, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN better than the Viltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH?

  • 438 g lighter (370 g vs 808 g)
  • 30 mm shorter (70 mm vs 100 mm long)
  • Focuses 3 cm closer (0.22 m vs 0.25 m)
  • Smaller filter thread (62 mm vs 82 mm)
  • Newer design (2022 vs 2020)

Why is the Viltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH better than the Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN?

  • More aperture blades (14 vs 9)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • landscape For landscape photography, the Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN has the edge: it is 438 g lighter to carry.
  • architecture For architecture, the Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN has the edge: it is 438 g lighter to carry.
03

Specification

16 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationSigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DNViltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH
Focal length20mm 20mm
Maximum aperturef/2 f/2
Minimum aperturef/22 f/16
Lens typePrime lens Prime lens
FormatFull frame Full Frame
Weight370 g ◆808 g
Dimensions74.4 x 70 mm 100 x 80 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.22 m ◆0.25 m
Image stabilizationNo No
Aperture ringNo —
Aperture blades9 14 ◆
Optical construction13 elements / 11 groups 12 elements / 9 groups
Filter size62 mm ◆82 mm
Lens mountSony E, L-Mount L-Mount
Released2022 2020
Price—$499 list price
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Sigma
  • B · Viltrox
  • 70 × 74.4 mm
  • 100 × 80 mm

The Viltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH is 30 mm longer and 438 g heavier than the Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN

takanawa
takanawa by 7010333
Rheinlicht Festival
Rheinlicht Festival by RS_1978
untitled
untitled by aaron norberg
untitled
untitled by aaron norberg
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN review 1
Video thumbnail for Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN review 2
Video thumbnail for Viltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH review 1
Video thumbnail for Viltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH review 2
07

Questions

Which is lighter, the Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN or the Viltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH?
The Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN weighs 370 g, 438 g less than the Viltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH (808 g).
Which focuses closer, the Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN or the Viltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH?
The Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN focuses down to 0.22 m, against 0.25 m for the Viltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH.
Do the Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN and the Viltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH have image stabilization?
No, neither lens has optical image stabilization; rely on in-body stabilization if your camera has it.
Is the Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN or the Viltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH better for landscape photography?
For landscape photography, the Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN has the edge: it is 438 g lighter to carry.
Is the Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN or the Viltrox PFU RBMH 20 mm T2 ASPH better for architecture?
For architecture, the Sigma C 20 mm f/2 DG DN has the edge: it is 438 g lighter to carry.
08

Other comparisons