Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary § 03 Head to head
Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary vs Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD
Sigma 18–300mm f/3.5-6.3 is 125 g lighter. Tamron 18–400mm f/3.5-6.3 has a longer reach.
The Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary is an 18–300mm f/3.5-6.3 zoom, and the Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD is an 18–400mm f/3.5-6.3 zoom. On paper they trade blows, with 3 advantages each.
Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary 01
Key differences
Why is the Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary better than the Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD?
- 125 g lighter (585 g vs 710 g)
- 22 mm shorter (101.5 mm vs 123.9 mm long)
- Focuses 6 cm closer (0.39 m vs 0.45 m)
Why is the Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD better than the Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary?
- Longer reach (400mm vs 300mm)
- Is weather sealed
- Newer design (2017 vs 2014)
02
Which should you buy?
- macro For macro photography, the Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.39 m.
- landscape For landscape photography, the Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD has the edge: it is weather sealed.
- architecture For architecture, the Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary has the edge: it is 125 g lighter to carry.
03
Specification
| Specification | Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary | Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD |
|---|---|---|
| Focal length | 18–300mm | 18–400mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.3 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22-40 | f/40 |
| Lens type | Superzoom lens | Zoom lens |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weight | 585 g (1.29 lbs) ◆ | 710 g (25.04 oz) |
| Dimensions | 79 mm (diameter) x 101.5 mm (length) | 123.9 x 79 mm |
| Minimum focusing distance | 0.39 m (15.4 in) ◆ | 0.45 m (17.72 inches) |
| Maximum magnification | 0.33x | — |
| Image stabilization | Yes (Optical Stabilizer) | Yes |
| Weather sealing | No | Yes ◆ |
| Aperture ring | No | No |
| Aperture blades | 7 (rounded) | 7 |
| Optical construction | 17 elements in 13 groups | 16 elements / 11 groups |
| Filter size | 72 mm | 72 mm |
| Lens mount | Canon EF, Nikon F, Sigma SA, Sony A, Pentax K | Nikon F, Canon EF-S |
| Released | 2014 | 2017 |
| Price | — | $649 launch price |
04
Size
- A · Sigma
- B · Tamron
- 101.5 × 79 mm
- 123.9 × 79 mm
The Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD is 22 mm longer and 125 g heavier than the Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary.
05
Sample frames
Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary
Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD
06
Video reviews
07
Questions
- Which is lighter, the Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary or the Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD?
- The Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary weighs 585 g, 125 g less than the Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD (710 g).
- Which focuses closer, the Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary or the Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD?
- The Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary focuses down to 0.39 m, against 0.45 m for the Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD.
- Do the Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary and the Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD have image stabilization?
- Yes, both lenses have optical image stabilization.
- Is the Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary or the Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD better for macro photography?
- For macro photography, the Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.39 m.
- Is the Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Contemporary or the Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD better for landscape photography?
- For landscape photography, the Tamron 18-400 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD has the edge: it is weather sealed.



