§ 03 Head to head

Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE vs TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED

Samyang 75mm f/1.8 is 0.3 stops brighter maximum aperture. TTartisan 75mm f/2 is 3 mm shorter.

Both lenses are made for the Sony E mount: the Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE is a 75mm f/1.8 prime, and the TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED is a 75mm f/2 prime. On paper the Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE comes out ahead, 4 advantages to 2, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE better than the TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED?

  • 0.3 stops brighter maximum aperture (f/1.8 vs f/2)
  • 110 g lighter (230 g vs 340 g)
  • Focuses 6 cm closer (0.69 m vs 0.75 m)
  • Smaller filter thread (58 mm vs 62 mm)

Why is the TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED better than the Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE?

  • 3 mm shorter (66 mm vs 69 mm long)
  • Newer design (2024 vs 2020)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • portrait For portrait photography, the Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE has the edge: its f/1.8 aperture gathers more light than f/2.
  • low-light For low-light shooting, the Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE has the edge: its f/1.8 aperture gathers more light than f/2.
03

Specification

18 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationSamyang AF 75mm F1.8 FETTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED
Focal length75mm 75mm
Maximum aperturef/1.8 ◆f/2
Minimum aperturef/22 f/16
Lens typeShort telephoto prime lens Prime lens
FormatFull Frame Full frame
Weight230 g (8.11 oz) ◆340 g (12.00 oz)
Dimensions65 mm (diameter) x 69 mm (length) 80 x 66 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.69 m (2.26 ft) ◆0.75 m (29.53 inches)
Maximum magnification0.13x —
Image stabilizationNo No
Weather sealingNo —
Aperture ringNo No
Aperture blades9 (rounded) 9
Optical construction10 elements in 9 groups (3 Extra Low Dispersion, 2 High Refractive Index) 10 elements / 7 groups
Filter size58 mm ◆62 mm
Lens mountSony E Sony E, Nikon Z, Fujifilm X, L-Mount
Released2020 2024
Price—$199 launch price
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Samyang
  • B · TTartisan
  • 69 × 65 mm
  • 66 × 80 mm

The Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE is 3 mm longer and 110 g lighter than the TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE

DSC03244_1
DSC03244_1 by Satoshi Donomae
Castelsardo, Sardegna
Castelsardo, Sardegna by jahertor90
Castelsardo, Sardegna
Castelsardo, Sardegna by jahertor90
Spring Reloaded
Spring Reloaded by orbed

TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED

kröller & müller
kröller & müller by bert • bakker
concealed color genes
concealed color genes by bert • bakker
oliwia . rower
oliwia . rower by bert • bakker
DSCF5508s
DSCF5508s by adigstudio
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE review 1
Video thumbnail for Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE review 2
Video thumbnail for TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED review 1
Video thumbnail for TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED review 2
07

Questions

Which lens has the brighter aperture, the Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE or the TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED?
The Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE opens to f/1.8, against f/2 on the TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED, 0.3 stops brighter.
Which is lighter, the Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE or the TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED?
The Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE weighs 230 g, 110 g less than the TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED (340 g).
Which focuses closer, the Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE or the TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED?
The Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE focuses down to 0.69 m, against 0.75 m for the TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED.
Do the Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE and the TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED have image stabilization?
No, neither lens has optical image stabilization; rely on in-body stabilization if your camera has it.
Is the Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE or the TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED better for portrait photography?
For portrait photography, the Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE has the edge: its f/1.8 aperture gathers more light than f/2.
Is the Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE or the TTartisan AF 75 mm f/2 ED better for low-light shooting?
For low-light shooting, the Samyang AF 75mm F1.8 FE has the edge: its f/1.8 aperture gathers more light than f/2.
08

Other comparisons