§ 03 Head to head

Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH vs Yongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT

Panasonic 15mm f/1.7 has a wider field of view. Yongnuo 17mm f/1.7 has a longer reach.

Both lenses are made for the Micro Four Thirds mount: the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH is a 15mm f/1.7 prime, and the Yongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT is a 17mm f/1.7 prime. On paper the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH comes out ahead, 5 advantages to 3, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH better than the Yongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT?

  • Wider field of view (15mm vs 17mm)
  • 65 g lighter (115 g vs 180 g)
  • 30 mm shorter (36 mm vs 65.8 mm long)
  • Has a physical aperture ring
  • Smaller filter thread (46 mm vs 52 mm)

Why is the Yongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT better than the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH?

  • Longer reach (17mm vs 15mm)
  • Focuses 2 cm closer (0.18 m vs 0.2 m)
  • Newer design (2024 vs 2014)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • landscape For landscape photography, the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH has the edge: it goes wider, to 15mm against 17mm.
  • architecture For architecture, the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH has the edge: it goes wider, to 15mm against 17mm.
  • astrophotography For astrophotography, the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH has the edge: it goes wider, to 15mm against 17mm.
03

Specification

17 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationPanasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPHYongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT
Focal length15mm 17mm
Maximum aperturef/1.7 f/1.7
Minimum aperturef/16 f/22
Lens typeWide-angle prime lens Prime lens
FormatMicro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Weight115 g (4.06 oz) ◆180 g
Dimensions57.5 mm (diameter) x 36 mm (length) 77.8 x 65.8 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.2 m (7.9 inches) 0.18 m ◆
Maximum magnification0.10x (0.20x 35mm equivalent) —
Image stabilizationNo No
Weather sealingNo —
Aperture ringYes No
Aperture blades7 (rounded) 7
Optical construction9 elements in 7 groups 10 elements / 9 groups
Filter size46 mm ◆52 mm
Lens mountMicro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Released2014 2024
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Panasonic
  • B · Yongnuo
  • 36 × 57.5 mm
  • 65.8 × 77.8 mm

The Yongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT is 30 mm longer and 65 g heavier than the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH

Adem
Adem by pelsedyr
Elora 3
Elora 3 by Pro Photography Sam
Elora 2
Elora 2 by Pro Photography Sam
Elora 1
Elora 1 by Pro Photography Sam
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH review 1
Video thumbnail for Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH review 2
Video thumbnail for Yongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT review 1
Video thumbnail for Yongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT review 2
07

Questions

Which is lighter, the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH or the Yongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT?
The Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH weighs 115 g, 65 g less than the Yongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT (180 g).
Which focuses closer, the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH or the Yongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT?
The Yongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT focuses down to 0.18 m, against 0.2 m for the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH.
Do the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH and the Yongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT have image stabilization?
No, neither lens has optical image stabilization; rely on in-body stabilization if your camera has it.
Is the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH or the Yongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT better for landscape photography?
For landscape photography, the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH has the edge: it goes wider, to 15mm against 17mm.
Is the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH or the Yongnuo YN 17 mm f/1.7 MFT better for architecture?
For architecture, the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH has the edge: it goes wider, to 15mm against 17mm.
08

Other comparisons