§ 03 Head to head

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO vs Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X

Olympus 90mm f/3.5 is 166 g lighter. Laowa 90mm f/2.8 is 0.6 stops brighter maximum aperture.

Both lenses are made for the Micro Four Thirds mount: the OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO is a 90mm f/3.5 prime, and the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X is a 90mm f/2.8 prime. On paper the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X comes out ahead, 5 advantages to 4, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO better than the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X?

  • 166 g lighter (453 g vs 619 g)
  • Has optical image stabilization
  • Is weather sealed
  • Smaller filter thread (62 mm vs 67 mm)

Why is the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X better than the OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO?

  • 0.6 stops brighter maximum aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.5)
  • 16 mm shorter (120 mm vs 136 mm long)
  • Focuses 2 cm closer (0.2 m vs 0.22 m)
  • More aperture blades (13 vs 7)
  • Covers a larger sensor format (full-frame vs Micro Four Thirds)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • macro For macro photography, the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.2 m.
  • portrait For portrait photography, the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X has the edge: its f/2.8 aperture gathers more light than f/3.5.
03

Specification

18 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationOlympus OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PROVenus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X
Focal length90mm 90mm
Maximum aperturef/3.5 f/2.8 ◆
Minimum aperturef/22 f/22
Lens typeMacro prime lens Prime lens
FormatMicro Four Thirds Full frame
Weight453 g (1 lb) ◆619 g
Dimensions69.8 mm (diameter) x 136 mm (length) 120 x 74 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.224 m (8.8 inches) 0.205 m ◆
Maximum magnification2x (4x 35mm equivalent) —
Image stabilizationYes (up to 7 stops with Sync IS) ◆No
Weather sealingIP53-rated dust, splash, and freeze-resistant ◆No
Aperture ringNo No
Aperture blades7 (circular) 13 ◆
Optical construction18 elements in 13 groups (including 4 ED, 1 Super ED, 1 HR, and 2 Super HR elements) 13 elements / 10 groups
Filter size62 mm ◆67 mm
Lens mountMicro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds, Sony E, Nikon Z, Canon RF, L-Mount
Released2022 2022
Price—$499 launch price
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Olympus
  • B · Venus
  • 136 × 69.8 mm
  • 120 × 74 mm

The OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO is 16 mm longer and 166 g lighter than the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO

Scharlachlibelle / Zarte Rubinjungfer / Späte Adonislibelle
Scharlachlibelle / Zarte Rubinjungfer / Späte Adonislibelle by mate-fotos
Plagiognathus arbustorum
Plagiognathus arbustorum by dbarlow
Black Arches Moth
Black Arches Moth by niloc's pic's
Black Arches Moth
Black Arches Moth by niloc's pic's

Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X

Nigella
Nigella by u_beeh
Grassbound Galaxies
Grassbound Galaxies by dawid.saladra
The Oracle and the Seed
The Oracle and the Seed by dawid.saladra
Petalclock
Petalclock by dawid.saladra
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO review 1
Video thumbnail for OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO review 2
Video thumbnail for Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X review 1
Video thumbnail for Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X review 2
07

Questions

Which lens has the brighter aperture, the OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO or the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X?
The Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X opens to f/2.8, against f/3.5 on the OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO, 0.6 stops brighter.
Which is lighter, the OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO or the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X?
The OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO weighs 453 g, 166 g less than the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X (619 g).
Which focuses closer, the OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO or the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X?
The Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X focuses down to 0.2 m, against 0.22 m for the OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO.
Do the OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO and the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X have image stabilization?
Only the OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO has optical image stabilization.
Is the OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO or the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X better for macro photography?
For macro photography, the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.2 m.
Is the OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO or the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X better for portrait photography?
For portrait photography, the Venus Optics LAOWA FFII 90 mm f/2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2X has the edge: its f/2.8 aperture gathers more light than f/3.5.
08

Other comparisons