§ 03 Head to head
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ vs Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S.
Olympus 12–50mm f/3.5-6.3 has a longer reach. Panasonic 12–32mm f/3.5-5.6 has a brighter maximum aperture.
Both lenses are made for the Micro Four Thirds mount: the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ is a 12–50mm f/3.5-6.3 zoom, and the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S. is a 12–32mm f/3.5-5.6 zoom. On paper the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S. comes out ahead, 7 advantages to 1, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.
01
Key differences
Why is the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ better than the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S.?
- Longer reach (50mm vs 32mm)
Why is the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S. better than the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ?
- Brighter maximum aperture (f/3.5-5.6 vs f/3.5-6.3)
- 141 g lighter (70 g vs 211 g)
- 59 mm shorter (24 mm vs 83 mm long)
- Has optical image stabilization
- More aperture blades (7 vs 5)
- Smaller filter thread (37 mm vs 52 mm)
- Newer design (2013 vs 2011)
02
Which should you buy?
- landscape For landscape photography, the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S. has the edge: it is 141 g lighter to carry.
- architecture For architecture, the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S. has the edge: it is 141 g lighter to carry.
03
Specification
| Specification | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ | Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S. |
|---|---|---|
| Focal length | 12–50mm | 12–32mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.3 | f/3.5-5.6 ◆ |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Lens type | Zoom lens | Zoom lens |
| Format | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Weight | 211 g (7.44 oz) | 70 g (2.47 oz) ◆ |
| Dimensions | 57 x 83 mm | 55.5 x 24 mm |
| Minimum focusing distance | 0.2 m (7.87 inches) | 0.2 m (7.87 inches) |
| Image stabilization | No | Yes ◆ |
| Weather sealing | Yes | — |
| Aperture ring | No | No |
| Aperture blades | 5 | 7 ◆ |
| Optical construction | 10 elements / 9 groups | 8 elements / 7 groups |
| Filter size | 52 mm | 37 mm ◆ |
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Released | 2011 | 2013 |
04
Size
- A · Olympus
- B · Panasonic
- 83 × 57 mm
- 24 × 55.5 mm
The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ is 59 mm longer and 141 g heavier than the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S..
05
Sample frames
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ
06
Video reviews
07
Questions
- Which lens has the brighter aperture, the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ or the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S.?
- The Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S. opens to f/3.5-5.6, against f/3.5-6.3 on the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ.
- Which is lighter, the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ or the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S.?
- The Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S. weighs 70 g, 141 g less than the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ (211 g).
- Do the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ and the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S. have image stabilization?
- Only the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S. has optical image stabilization.
- Is the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ or the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S. better for landscape photography?
- For landscape photography, the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S. has the edge: it is 141 g lighter to carry.
- Is the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 12-50 mm f/3.5-6.3 ED EZ or the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S. better for architecture?
- For architecture, the Panasonic G VARIO 12-32 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S. has the edge: it is 141 g lighter to carry.



