Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G § 03 Head to head
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G vs Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4
Nikon 35mm f/1.4 is 574 g lighter. Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 has a physical aperture ring.
Both lenses are made for the Nikon F mount: the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G is a 35mm f/1.4 prime, and the Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4 is a 35mm f/1.4 prime. On paper the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G comes out ahead, 3 advantages to 2, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G 
Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4 01
Key differences
Why is the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G better than the Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4?
- 574 g lighter (600 g vs 1174 g)
- 37 mm shorter (89.5 mm vs 126 mm long)
- Smaller filter thread (67 mm vs 72 mm)
Why is the Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4 better than the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G?
- Has a physical aperture ring
- Newer design (2015 vs 2010)
02
Which should you buy?
- street For street photography, the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G has the edge: it is 574 g lighter to carry.
- travel For travel, the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G has the edge: it is 574 g lighter to carry.
03
Specification
| Specification | Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G | Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal length | 35mm | 35mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.4 |
| Minimum aperture | f/16 | f/16 |
| Lens type | Prime lens | Standard prime lens |
| Format | Full frame | Full Frame |
| Weight | 600 g (21.16 oz) ◆ | 1174 g (2.59 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 89 x 89.5 mm | 85 mm (diameter) x 126 mm (length) |
| Minimum focusing distance | 0.3 m (11.81 inches) | 0.3 m (11.81 inches) |
| Maximum magnification | — | 0.22x |
| Image stabilization | No | No |
| Weather sealing | Yes | Yes |
| Aperture ring | No | Yes (manual) |
| Aperture blades | 9 | 9 |
| Optical construction | 10 elements / 7 groups | 14 elements in 11 groups |
| Filter size | 67 mm ◆ | 72 mm |
| Lens mount | Nikon F | Canon EF, Nikon F |
| Released | 2010 | 2015 |
04
Size
- A · Nikon
- B · Zeiss
- 89.5 × 89 mm
- 126 × 85 mm
The Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4 is 36 mm longer and 574 g heavier than the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G.
05
Sample frames
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G
Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4
06
Video reviews
07
Questions
- Which is lighter, the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G or the Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4?
- The Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G weighs 600 g, 574 g less than the Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4 (1174 g).
- Do the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G and the Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4 have image stabilization?
- No, neither lens has optical image stabilization; rely on in-body stabilization if your camera has it.
- Is the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G or the Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4 better for street photography?
- For street photography, the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G has the edge: it is 574 g lighter to carry.
- Is the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G or the Zeiss Milvus 35mm f/1.4 better for travel?
- For travel, the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.4G has the edge: it is 574 g lighter to carry.
08
Other comparisons
- Tamron SP 35 mm f/1.4 Di USD vs Zeiss Milvus 35mm F1.4
- Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/1.4s vs Zeiss Milvus 35mm F1.4
- Samyang Xeen 35 mm T1.5 vs Zeiss Milvus 35mm F1.4
- Canon EF 35mm F1.4L II USM vs Zeiss Milvus 35mm F1.4
- Samyang XP 35mm F1.2 vs Zeiss Milvus 35mm F1.4
- Yongnuo YN 35 mm f/1.4 vs Zeiss Milvus 35mm F1.4
- Sigma A 35 mm f/1.4 DG HSM vs Zeiss Milvus 35mm F1.4