Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D § 03 Head to head
Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D vs Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens
Nikon 60mm f/2.8 is 63 g lighter. Laowa 60mm f/2.8 is 5 mm shorter.
The Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D is a 60mm f/2.8 prime, and the Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens is a 60mm f/2.8 prime. On paper the Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens comes out ahead, 3 advantages to 2, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.
Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D 
Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens 01
Key differences
Why is the Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D better than the Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens?
- 63 g lighter (440 g vs 503 g)
- Covers a larger sensor format (full-frame vs APS-C)
Why is the Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens better than the Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D?
- 5 mm shorter (70 mm vs 74.5 mm long)
- Focuses 4 cm closer (0.18 m vs 0.22 m)
- More aperture blades (14 vs 7)
02
Which should you buy?
- portrait For portrait photography, the Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D has the edge: it is 63 g lighter to carry.
- macro For macro photography, the Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.18 m.
03
Specification
| Specification | Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D | Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens |
|---|---|---|
| Focal length | 60mm | 60mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Minimum aperture | f/32 | f/22 |
| Lens type | Prime lens | Prime lens |
| Format | Full frame | APS-C |
| Weight | 440 g (15.52 oz) ◆ | 503 g (17.74 oz) |
| Dimensions | 70 x 74.5 mm | 95 x 70 mm |
| Minimum focusing distance | 0.219 m (8.62 inches) | 0.18 m (7.09 inches) ◆ |
| Aperture ring | — | Yes |
| Aperture blades | 7 | 14 ◆ |
| Optical construction | 8 elements in 7 groups | 9 elements / 7 groups |
| Filter size | 62 mm | 62 mm |
| Lens mount | Nikon F | Canon EF, Nikon F, Sony A, Pentax K, Sony E |
04
Size
- A · Nikon
- B · Venus
- 74.5 × 70 mm
- 70 × 95 mm
The Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D is 5 mm longer and 63 g lighter than the Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens.
05
Sample frames
Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D
Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens
06
Video reviews
07
Questions
- Which is lighter, the Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D or the Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens?
- The Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D weighs 440 g, 63 g less than the Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens (503 g).
- Which focuses closer, the Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D or the Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens?
- The Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens focuses down to 0.18 m, against 0.22 m for the Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D.
- Is the Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D or the Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens better for portrait photography?
- For portrait photography, the Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D has the edge: it is 63 g lighter to carry.
- Is the Nikon Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm f/2.8D or the Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens better for macro photography?
- For macro photography, the Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.18 m.
08
Other comparisons
- Nikon Nikkor MF 55 mm f/2.8 Micro vs Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens
- Sigma 70mm F2.8 DG Macro Art vs Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens
- Nikon Nikkor AF-S Micro 60 mm f/2.8G ED vs Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens
- Sony 50 mm f/2.8 Macro vs Venus Optics LAOWA 60 mm f/2.8 Ultra-Macro Lens