§ 03 Head to head

Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine vs Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro

Meike 18mm f/2.1 has a wider field of view. Mitakon 20mm f/2 is 0.1 stops brighter maximum aperture.

Both lenses are made for the Canon EF mount: the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine is an 18mm f/2.1 prime, and the Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro is a 20mm f/2 prime. On paper the Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro comes out ahead, 7 advantages to 3, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine better than the Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro?

  • Wider field of view (18mm vs 20mm)
  • More aperture blades (10 vs 3)
  • Newer design (2022 vs 2016)

Why is the Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro better than the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine?

  • 0.1 stops brighter maximum aperture (f/2 vs f/2.1)
  • Longer reach (20mm vs 18mm)
  • 697 g lighter (230 g vs 927 g)
  • 43 mm shorter (62 mm vs 104.5 mm long)
  • Focuses 5 cm closer (0.2 m vs 0.25 m)
  • $451 cheaper ($199 launch price vs $649.99 list price)
  • Covers a larger sensor format (full-frame vs APS-C)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • landscape For landscape photography, the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine has the edge: it goes wider, to 18mm against 20mm.
  • architecture For architecture, the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine has the edge: it goes wider, to 18mm against 20mm.
  • macro For macro photography, the Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro has the edge: it focuses closer, down to 0.2 m.
  • low-light For low-light shooting, the Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro has the edge: its f/2 aperture gathers more light than f/2.1.
  • astrophotography For astrophotography, the Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro has the edge: its f/2 aperture gathers more light than f/2.1.
03

Specification

16 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationMeike 18 mm T2.1 CineMitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro
Focal length18mm 20mm
Maximum aperturef/2.1 f/2 ◆
Minimum aperturef/22 f/16
Lens typePrime lens Prime lens
FormatAPS-C Full frame
Weight927 g (32.69 oz) 230 g (8.11 oz) ◆
Dimensions104.5 x 85.5 mm 60 x 62 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.25 m (9.84 inches) 0.2 m (7.87 inches) ◆
Image stabilizationNo No
Aperture ringYes Yes
Aperture blades10 ◆3
Optical construction15 elements / 10 groups 6 elements / 4 groups
Filter size77 mm —
Lens mountCanon EF, PL Canon EF, Nikon F, Sony A, Pentax K, Micro Four Thirds, Sony E, Fujifilm X
Released2022 2016
Price$649.99 list price $199 launch price ◆
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Meike
  • B · Mitakon
  • 104.5 × 85.5 mm
  • 62 × 60 mm

The Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine is 43 mm longer and 697 g heavier than the Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro.

06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine review 1
Video thumbnail for Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine review 2
Video thumbnail for Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro review 1
Video thumbnail for Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro review 2
07

Questions

Which lens has the brighter aperture, the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine or the Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro?
The Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro opens to f/2, against f/2.1 on the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine, 0.1 stops brighter.
Which is lighter, the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine or the Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro?
The Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro weighs 230 g, 697 g less than the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine (927 g).
Which focuses closer, the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine or the Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro?
The Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro focuses down to 0.2 m, against 0.25 m for the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine.
Do the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine and the Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro have image stabilization?
No, neither lens has optical image stabilization; rely on in-body stabilization if your camera has it.
Is the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine or the Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro better for landscape photography?
For landscape photography, the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine has the edge: it goes wider, to 18mm against 20mm.
Is the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine or the Mitakon 20 mm f/2.0 4.5x Super Macro better for architecture?
For architecture, the Meike 18 mm T2.1 Cine has the edge: it goes wider, to 18mm against 20mm.
08

Other comparisons