§ 03 Head to head

HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye vs Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM

Pentax 10–17mm f/3.5-4.5 is 203 g lighter. Sigma 10–20mm f/3.5 has a brighter maximum aperture.

The HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye is a 10–17mm f/3.5-4.5 zoom, and the Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM is a 10–20mm f/3.5 zoom. On paper the Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM comes out ahead, 4 advantages to 3, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye better than the Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM?

  • 203 g lighter (317 g vs 520 g)
  • 18 mm shorter (70 mm vs 88.2 mm long)
  • Focuses 10 cm closer (0.14 m vs 0.24 m)

Why is the Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM better than the HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye?

  • Brighter maximum aperture (f/3.5 vs f/3.5-4.5)
  • Longer reach (20mm vs 17mm)
  • More aperture blades (7 vs 6)
  • Newer design (2009 vs 2006)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • landscape For landscape photography, the HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye has the edge: it is 203 g lighter to carry.
  • architecture For architecture, the HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye has the edge: it is 203 g lighter to carry.
03

Specification

17 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationHD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED FisheyeSigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM
Focal length10–17mm 10–20mm
Maximum aperturef/3.5-4.5 f/3.5 ◆
Minimum aperturef/22-32 f/22
Lens typeFisheye zoom lens Zoom lens
FormatAPS-C APS-C
Weight317 g (11.2 oz) ◆520 g (18.34 oz)
Dimensions67.5 mm (diameter) x 70 mm (length) 87.3 x 88.2 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.14 m (5.5 inches) ◆0.24 m (9.45 inches)
Maximum magnification0.39x —
Image stabilizationNo —
Weather sealingNo —
Aperture ringNo —
Aperture blades6 (rounded) 7 ◆
Optical construction10 elements in 8 groups 13 elements in 10 groups
Filter size—82 mm
Lens mountPentax K Nikon F, Sony A, Sigma SA, Pentax K, Canon EF-S
Released2006 2009
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · HD
  • B · Sigma
  • 70 × 67.5 mm
  • 88.2 × 87.3 mm

The Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM is 18 mm longer and 203 g heavier than the HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM

Maplewood Sunset....
Maplewood Sunset.... by Kevin Povenz
617 Sqn
617 Sqn by C P O'Rourke
Lunar Halo....
Lunar Halo.... by Kevin Povenz
Fiume d'Anterselva
Fiume d'Anterselva by Gugu89
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye review 1
Video thumbnail for HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye review 2
Video thumbnail for Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM review 1
Video thumbnail for Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM review 2
07

Questions

Which lens has the brighter aperture, the HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye or the Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM?
The Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM opens to f/3.5, against f/3.5-4.5 on the HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye.
Which is lighter, the HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye or the Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM?
The HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye weighs 317 g, 203 g less than the Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM (520 g).
Which focuses closer, the HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye or the Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM?
The HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye focuses down to 0.14 m, against 0.24 m for the Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM.
Is the HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye or the Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM better for landscape photography?
For landscape photography, the HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye has the edge: it is 203 g lighter to carry.
Is the HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye or the Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM better for architecture?
For architecture, the HD Pentax-DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Fisheye has the edge: it is 203 g lighter to carry.
08

Other comparisons