§ 03 Head to head

Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR vs Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift

Fujifilm 23mm f/4 has a longer reach. Laowa 20mm f/4 has a wider field of view.

The Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR is a 23mm f/4 prime, and the Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift is a 20mm f/4 prime. On paper the Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift comes out ahead, 6 advantages to 3, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR better than the Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift?

  • Longer reach (23mm vs 20mm)
  • Has a physical aperture ring
  • Covers a larger sensor format (medium-format vs full-frame)

Why is the Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift better than the Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR?

  • Wider field of view (20mm vs 23mm)
  • 98 g lighter (747 g vs 845 g)
  • 8 mm shorter (95 mm vs 103 mm long)
  • Focuses 13 cm closer (0.25 m vs 0.38 m)
  • More aperture blades (14 vs 9)
  • Newer design (2022 vs 2017)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • landscape For landscape photography, the Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift has the edge: it goes wider, to 20mm against 23mm.
  • architecture For architecture, the Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift has the edge: it goes wider, to 20mm against 23mm.
03

Specification

17 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationFujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WRVenus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift
Focal length23mm 20mm
Maximum aperturef/4 f/4
Minimum aperturef/32 f/22
Lens typePrime lens Prime lens
FormatMedium format Full frame
Weight845 g (29.81 oz) 747 g ◆
Dimensions89.8 x 103 mm 91 x 95 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.38 m (14.96 inches) 0.25 m ◆
Image stabilizationNo No
Weather sealingYes —
Aperture ringYes No
Aperture blades9 14 ◆
Optical construction15 elements / 12 groups 16 elements / 11 groups
Filter size82 mm 82 mm
Lens mountFujifilm G Canon EF, Nikon F, Pentax K, Sony E, Nikon Z, Canon RF, Fujifilm G, L-Mount
Released2017 2022
Price—$1,299 launch price
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Fujifilm
  • B · Venus
  • 103 × 89.8 mm
  • 95 × 91 mm

The Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR is 8 mm longer and 98 g heavier than the Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR

Social Divide
Social Divide by Danton Claramunt
Dune
Dune by Danton Claramunt
Curved Geometry
Curved Geometry by Danton Claramunt
Brookfield Place
Brookfield Place by Danton Claramunt
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR review 1
Video thumbnail for Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR review 2
Video thumbnail for Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift review 1
Video thumbnail for Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift review 2
07

Questions

Which is lighter, the Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR or the Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift?
The Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift weighs 747 g, 98 g less than the Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR (845 g).
Which focuses closer, the Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR or the Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift?
The Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift focuses down to 0.25 m, against 0.38 m for the Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR.
Do the Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR and the Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift have image stabilization?
No, neither lens has optical image stabilization; rely on in-body stabilization if your camera has it.
Is the Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR or the Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift better for landscape photography?
For landscape photography, the Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift has the edge: it goes wider, to 20mm against 23mm.
Is the Fujifilm Fujinon GF 23 mm f/4 R LM WR or the Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift better for architecture?
For architecture, the Venus Optics LAOWA 20 mm f/4 Zero-D Shift has the edge: it goes wider, to 20mm against 23mm.
08

Other comparisons