§ 03 Head to head

Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2 vs Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2

Nikon 35mm f/2 is 419 g lighter.

The Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2 is a 35mm f/2 prime, and the Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2 is a 35mm f/2 prime. On paper the Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2 comes out ahead, 3 advantages to 0, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2 better than the Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2?

No measurable advantage on paper.

Why is the Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2 better than the Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2?

  • 419 g lighter (283 g vs 702 g)
  • Has a physical aperture ring
  • Smaller filter thread (52 mm vs 58 mm)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • street For street photography, the Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2 has the edge: it is 419 g lighter to carry.
  • travel For travel, the Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2 has the edge: it is 419 g lighter to carry.
03

Specification

16 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationCarl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2
Focal length35mm 35mm
Maximum aperturef/2 f/2
Minimum aperturef/22 f/22
Lens typePrime lens Prime lens
FormatFull frame Full frame
Weight702 g (24.76 oz) 283 g (9.98 oz) ◆
Dimensions77 x 83 mm —
Minimum focusing distance0.3 m (11.81 inches) 0.30 m (11.81 inches)
Image stabilizationNo No
Weather sealingYes —
Aperture ringNo Yes
Aperture blades—7
Optical construction9 elements / 7 groups 8 elements / 6 groups
Filter size58 mm 52 mm ◆
Lens mountCanon EF, Nikon F Nikon F
Released2015 —
05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2

Skater
Skater by Brian Giorgio
Au coin de la rue
Au coin de la rue by Un singe en automne
PART OF MY T* KIT
PART OF MY T* KIT by pharoldos
Swedish spirit
Swedish spirit by Un singe en automne

Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2

SCP_6145 Kodak Gold 100
SCP_6145 Kodak Gold 100 by sachandler76
SCP_6144 Kodak Gold 100
SCP_6144 Kodak Gold 100 by sachandler76
Hudson Valley
Hudson Valley by MonikaMurren
Locked & Loaded.
Locked & Loaded. by Spirit Vision Photography
06

Video reviews

3 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2 review 1
Video thumbnail for Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2 review 1
Video thumbnail for Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2 review 2
07

Questions

Which is lighter, the Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2 or the Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2?
The Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2 weighs 283 g, 419 g less than the Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2 (702 g).
Do the Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2 and the Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2 have image stabilization?
No, neither lens has optical image stabilization; rely on in-body stabilization if your camera has it.
Is the Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2 or the Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2 better for street photography?
For street photography, the Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2 has the edge: it is 419 g lighter to carry.
Is the Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2 or the Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2 better for travel?
For travel, the Nikon Nikkor MF 35 mm f/2 has the edge: it is 419 g lighter to carry.
08

Other comparisons