§ 03 Head to head

Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2 vs Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR

Zeiss 135mm f/2 is 7 mm shorter. Samyang 135mm f/2 is 293 g lighter.

Both lenses are made for the Canon EF mount: the Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2 is a 135mm f/2 prime, and the Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR is a 135mm f/2 prime. On paper they trade blows, with 2 advantages each.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2 better than the Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR?

  • 7 mm shorter (115 mm vs 122 mm long)
  • Newer design (2016 vs 2015)

Why is the Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR better than the Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2?

  • 293 g lighter (830 g vs 1123 g)
  • Has a physical aperture ring
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • portrait For portrait photography, the Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR has the edge: it is 293 g lighter to carry.
03

Specification

16 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationCarl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR
Focal length135mm 135mm
Maximum aperturef/2 f/2
Minimum aperturef/22 f/22
Lens typePrime lens Prime lens
FormatFull frame Full frame
Weight1123 g (39.61 oz) 830 g (29.28 oz) ◆
Dimensions89.7 x 115 mm 82 x 122 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.80 m (31.50 inches) 0.8 m (31.50 inches)
Image stabilizationNo No
Weather sealingYes —
Aperture ringNo Yes
Aperture blades9 9
Optical construction11 elements / 8 groups 11 elements / 7 groups
Filter size77 mm 77 mm
Lens mountCanon EF, Nikon F Canon EF, Nikon F, Sony A, Micro Four Thirds, Sony E
Released2016 2015
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Carl
  • B · Samyang
  • 115 × 89.7 mm
  • 122 × 82 mm

The Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR is 7 mm longer and 293 g lighter than the Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR

The Cave Nebula (Sh2-155 / Caldwell 9)
The Cave Nebula (Sh2-155 / Caldwell 9) by danweiser2013
Pair of Victorian sttreetlamps and a blue tower
Pair of Victorian sttreetlamps and a blue tower by lynn smith
Watching
Watching by cari189
Dedication
Dedication by cari189
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2 review 1
Video thumbnail for Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2 review 2
Video thumbnail for Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR review 1
Video thumbnail for Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR review 2
07

Questions

Which is lighter, the Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2 or the Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR?
The Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR weighs 830 g, 293 g less than the Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2 (1123 g).
Do the Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2 and the Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR have image stabilization?
No, neither lens has optical image stabilization; rely on in-body stabilization if your camera has it.
Is the Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2 or the Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR better for portrait photography?
For portrait photography, the Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR has the edge: it is 293 g lighter to carry.
08

Other comparisons