§ 03 Head to head

Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye vs Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye

Canon 3.9mm f/3.5 has a wider field of view. Laowa 4mm f/2.8 is 0.6 stops brighter maximum aperture.

The Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye is a 3.9mm f/3.5 prime, and the Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye is a 4mm f/2.8 prime. On paper the Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye comes out ahead, 7 advantages to 2, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye better than the Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye?

  • Wider field of view (3.9mm vs 4mm)
  • Newer design (2024 vs 2018)

Why is the Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye better than the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye?

  • 0.6 stops brighter maximum aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.5)
  • Longer reach (4mm vs 3.9mm)
  • 155 g lighter (135 g vs 290 g)
  • 67 mm shorter (45.2 mm vs 112.1 mm long)
  • Focuses 12 cm closer (0.08 m vs 0.2 m)
  • Has a physical aperture ring
  • $900 cheaper ($199 launch price vs $1,099 launch price)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • landscape For landscape photography, the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye has the edge: it goes wider, to 3.9mm against 4mm.
  • architecture For architecture, the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye has the edge: it goes wider, to 3.9mm against 4mm.
03

Specification

17 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationCanon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual FisheyeVenus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye
Focal length3.9mm 4mm
Maximum aperturef/3.5 f/2.8 ◆
Minimum aperturef/16 f/22
Lens typePrime lens Prime lens
FormatAPS-C APS-C
Weight290 g 135 g (4.76 oz) ◆
Dimensions83.7 x 112.1 mm 25.5 x 45.2 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.20 m 0.08 m (3.15 inches) ◆
Image stabilizationNo No
Weather sealing—No
Aperture ringNo Yes
Aperture blades7 7
Optical construction11 elements / 8 groups 7 elements / 6 groups
Filter size30.5 mm —
Lens mountCanon RF Micro Four Thirds, Sony E, Nikon Z, Canon RF, Fujifilm X, Canon EF-M, L-Mount
Released2024 2018
Price$1,099 launch price $199 launch price ◆
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Canon
  • B · Venus
  • 112.1 × 83.7 mm
  • 45.2 × 25.5 mm

The Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye is 67 mm longer and 155 g heavier than the Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye

Planet Louvre
Planet Louvre by Paul de Roode
Planet Louvre
Planet Louvre by Paul de Roode
Planet Louvre
Planet Louvre by Paul de Roode
Eiffel_Panorama_Laowa_4mm
Eiffel_Panorama_Laowa_4mm by Bruce.Ferjulian
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye review 1
Video thumbnail for Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye review 2
Video thumbnail for Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye review 1
Video thumbnail for Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye review 2
07

Questions

Which lens has the brighter aperture, the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye or the Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye?
The Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye opens to f/2.8, against f/3.5 on the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye, 0.6 stops brighter.
Which is lighter, the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye or the Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye?
The Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye weighs 135 g, 155 g less than the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye (290 g).
Which focuses closer, the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye or the Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye?
The Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye focuses down to 0.08 m, against 0.2 m for the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye.
Do the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye and the Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye have image stabilization?
No, neither lens has optical image stabilization; rely on in-body stabilization if your camera has it.
Is the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye or the Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye better for landscape photography?
For landscape photography, the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye has the edge: it goes wider, to 3.9mm against 4mm.
Is the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye or the Venus Optics LAOWA 4 mm f/2.8 Fisheye better for architecture?
For architecture, the Canon RF-S 3.9 mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye has the edge: it goes wider, to 3.9mm against 4mm.
08

Other comparisons