§ 03 Head to head

Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM vs Tokina AT-X DX AF 16.5-135 mm f/3.5-5.6

Canon 15–85mm f/3.5-5.6 has a wider field of view. Tokina 16.5–135mm f/3.5-5.6 has a longer reach.

The Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM is a 15–85mm f/3.5-5.6 zoom, and the Tokina AT-X DX AF 16.5-135 mm f/3.5-5.6 is a 16.5–135mm f/3.5-5.6 zoom. On paper the Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM comes out ahead, 4 advantages to 3, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM better than the Tokina AT-X DX AF 16.5-135 mm f/3.5-5.6?

  • Wider field of view (15mm vs 16.5mm)
  • 35 g lighter (575 g vs 610 g)
  • Focuses 15 cm closer (0.35 m vs 0.5 m)
  • Smaller filter thread (72 mm vs 77 mm)

Why is the Tokina AT-X DX AF 16.5-135 mm f/3.5-5.6 better than the Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM?

  • Longer reach (135mm vs 85mm)
  • 10 mm shorter (78 mm vs 87.5 mm long)
  • More aperture blades (9 vs 7)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • landscape For landscape photography, the Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM has the edge: it goes wider, to 15mm against 16.5mm.
  • architecture For architecture, the Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM has the edge: it goes wider, to 15mm against 16.5mm.
03

Specification

14 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationCanon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USMTokina AT-X DX AF 16.5-135 mm f/3.5-5.6
Focal length15–85mm 16.5–135mm
Maximum aperturef/3.5-5.6 f/3.5-5.6
Minimum aperturef/22-36 f/22
Lens typeZoom lens Zoom lens
FormatAPS-C APS-C
Weight575 g (20.28 oz) ◆610 g (21.52 oz)
Dimensions81.6 x 87.5 mm 84 x 78 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.35 m (13.78 inches) ◆0.5 m (19.69 inches)
Image stabilizationYes —
Aperture blades7 9 ◆
Optical construction17 elements / 12 groups 15 elements in 12 groups
Filter size72 mm ◆77 mm
Lens mountCanon EF-S Nikon F, Canon EF-S
Released2009 2009
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Canon
  • B · Tokina
  • 87.5 × 81.6 mm
  • 78 × 84 mm

The Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM is 10 mm longer and 35 g lighter than the Tokina AT-X DX AF 16.5-135 mm f/3.5-5.6.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Amy & Lindsay - an autumn walk - Clemson Univ. SC - USA
Amy & Lindsay - an autumn walk - Clemson Univ. SC - USA by DT's Photo Site - Anderson S.C.
Feeding the ducks - Clemson Univ. SC - USA
Feeding the ducks - Clemson Univ. SC - USA by DT's Photo Site - Anderson S.C.
Luke running in the woods - SC Botanical Gardens - Clemson SC - USA
Luke running in the woods - SC Botanical Gardens - Clemson SC - USA by DT's Photo Site - Anderson S.C.
Follow the tracks - Surfside Beach SC - USA
Follow the tracks - Surfside Beach SC - USA by DT's Photo Site - Anderson S.C.
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM review 1
Video thumbnail for Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM review 2
Video thumbnail for Tokina AT-X DX AF 16.5-135 mm f/3.5-5.6 review 1
Video thumbnail for Tokina AT-X DX AF 16.5-135 mm f/3.5-5.6 review 2
07

Questions

Which is lighter, the Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM or the Tokina AT-X DX AF 16.5-135 mm f/3.5-5.6?
The Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM weighs 575 g, 35 g less than the Tokina AT-X DX AF 16.5-135 mm f/3.5-5.6 (610 g).
Which focuses closer, the Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM or the Tokina AT-X DX AF 16.5-135 mm f/3.5-5.6?
The Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM focuses down to 0.35 m, against 0.5 m for the Tokina AT-X DX AF 16.5-135 mm f/3.5-5.6.
Is the Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM or the Tokina AT-X DX AF 16.5-135 mm f/3.5-5.6 better for landscape photography?
For landscape photography, the Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM has the edge: it goes wider, to 15mm against 16.5mm.
Is the Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM or the Tokina AT-X DX AF 16.5-135 mm f/3.5-5.6 better for architecture?
For architecture, the Canon EF-S 15-85 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM has the edge: it goes wider, to 15mm against 16.5mm.
08

Other comparisons