§ 03 Head to head

Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM vs Tamron 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD

Canon 10–22mm f/3.5-4.5 is 55 g lighter. Tamron 10–24mm f/3.5-4.5 has a longer reach.

The Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM is a 10–22mm f/3.5-4.5 zoom, and the Tamron 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD is a 10–24mm f/3.5-4.5 zoom. On paper the Tamron 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD comes out ahead, 4 advantages to 1, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM better than the Tamron 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD?

  • 55 g lighter (385 g vs 440 g)

Why is the Tamron 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD better than the Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM?

  • Longer reach (24mm vs 22mm)
  • 5 mm shorter (84.6 mm vs 89.8 mm long)
  • More aperture blades (7 vs 6)
  • Newer design (2017 vs 2004)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • landscape For landscape photography, the Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM has the edge: it is 55 g lighter to carry.
  • architecture For architecture, the Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM has the edge: it is 55 g lighter to carry.
03

Specification

16 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationCanon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USMTamron 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD
Focal length10–22mm 10–24mm
Maximum aperturef/3.5-4.5 f/3.5-4.5
Minimum aperturef/22-27 f/22
Lens typeZoom lens Zoom lens
FormatAPS-C APS-C
Weight385 g (13.58 oz) ◆440 g (15.52 oz)
Dimensions83.5 x 89.8 mm 83.6 x 84.6 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.24 m (9.45 inches) 0.24 m (9.45 inches)
Image stabilization—Yes
Weather sealing—Yes
Aperture ring—No
Aperture blades6 7 ◆
Optical construction13 elements in 10 groups 16 elements / 11 groups
Filter size77 mm 77 mm
Lens mountCanon EF-S Nikon F, Canon EF-S
Released2004 2017
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Canon
  • B · Tamron
  • 89.8 × 83.5 mm
  • 84.6 × 83.6 mm

The Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM is 5 mm longer and 55 g lighter than the Tamron 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

the paper bag building
the paper bag building by wheres_bruce
on the back of a paper bag
on the back of a paper bag by wheres_bruce
7219
7219 by Zack Huggins
7193
7193 by Zack Huggins

Tamron 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD

Huddersfield Indoor Market
Huddersfield Indoor Market by belly.1964
Leuven Townhall (Belgium)
Leuven Townhall (Belgium) by Robin VdB
What's behind the ..... # 62
What's behind the ..... # 62 by belly.1964
Have a Gingerbread Xmas Huddersfield
Have a Gingerbread Xmas Huddersfield by belly.1964
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM review 1
Video thumbnail for Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM review 2
Video thumbnail for Tamron 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD review 1
Video thumbnail for Tamron 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD review 2
07

Questions

Which is lighter, the Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM or the Tamron 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD?
The Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM weighs 385 g, 55 g less than the Tamron 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD (440 g).
Is the Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM or the Tamron 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD better for landscape photography?
For landscape photography, the Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM has the edge: it is 55 g lighter to carry.
Is the Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM or the Tamron 10-24 mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD better for architecture?
For architecture, the Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM has the edge: it is 55 g lighter to carry.
08

Other comparisons