§ 03 Head to head

Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM vs Samyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5

Canon 24mm f/1.4 is 0.2 stops brighter maximum aperture. Samyang 24mm f/1.5 has a physical aperture ring.

Both lenses are made for the Canon EF mount: the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM is a 24mm f/1.4 prime, and the Samyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5 is a 24mm f/1.5 prime. On paper the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM comes out ahead, 4 advantages to 3, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM better than the Samyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5?

  • 0.2 stops brighter maximum aperture (f/1.4 vs f/1.5)
  • 350 g lighter (550 g vs 900 g)
  • 23 mm shorter (77.4 mm vs 100 mm long)
  • Smaller filter thread (77 mm vs 95 mm)

Why is the Samyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5 better than the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM?

  • Has a physical aperture ring
  • More aperture blades (11 vs 7)
  • Newer design (2020 vs 1997)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • landscape For landscape photography, the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM has the edge: it is 350 g lighter to carry.
  • architecture For architecture, the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM has the edge: it is 350 g lighter to carry.
  • street For street photography, the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM has the edge: it is 350 g lighter to carry.
  • travel For travel, the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM has the edge: it is 350 g lighter to carry.
  • low-light For low-light shooting, the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM has the edge: its f/1.4 aperture gathers more light than f/1.5.
  • astrophotography For astrophotography, the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM has the edge: its f/1.4 aperture gathers more light than f/1.5.
03

Specification

16 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationCanon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USMSamyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5
Focal length24mm 24mm
Maximum aperturef/1.4 ◆f/1.5
Minimum aperturef/22 T22
Lens typePrime lens Prime lens
FormatFull frame Full frame
Weight550 g (19.40 oz) ◆900 g (31.75 oz)
Dimensions83.5 x 77.4 mm 100 x 98.5 mm
Minimum focusing distance0.25 m (9.84 inches) 0.25 m (9.84 inches)
Image stabilizationNo No
Aperture ringNo Yes
Aperture blades7 11 ◆
Optical construction11 elements / 9 groups —
Filter size77 mm ◆95 mm
Lens mountCanon EF Canon EF, PL, Sony E
Released1997 2020
Price—$2,995 list price
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Canon
  • B · Samyang
  • 77.4 × 83.5 mm
  • 100 × 98.5 mm

The Samyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5 is 23 mm longer and 350 g heavier than the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM

Aivazovsky point view of Gunib
Aivazovsky point view of Gunib by ArtDen82
Ancient village of Gamsutl
Ancient village of Gamsutl by ArtDen82
Autumn on Lake Dzhangyzkol
Autumn on Lake Dzhangyzkol by ArtDen82
Evening in Ghent
Evening in Ghent by ArtDen82
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM review 1
Video thumbnail for Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM review 2
Video thumbnail for Samyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5 review 1
Video thumbnail for Samyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5 review 2
07

Questions

Which lens has the brighter aperture, the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM or the Samyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5?
The Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM opens to f/1.4, against f/1.5 on the Samyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5, 0.2 stops brighter.
Which is lighter, the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM or the Samyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5?
The Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM weighs 550 g, 350 g less than the Samyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5 (900 g).
Do the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM and the Samyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5 have image stabilization?
No, neither lens has optical image stabilization; rely on in-body stabilization if your camera has it.
Is the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM or the Samyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5 better for landscape photography?
For landscape photography, the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM has the edge: it is 350 g lighter to carry.
Is the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM or the Samyang Xeen CF 24 mm T1.5 better for architecture?
For architecture, the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L USM has the edge: it is 350 g lighter to carry.
08

Other comparisons