§ 03 Head to head

Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A vs Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM

Canon 100–200mm f/4.5 has a brighter maximum aperture. Canon 100–300mm f/4.5-5.6 has a longer reach.

Both lenses are made for the Canon EF mount: the Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A is a 100–200mm f/4.5 zoom, and the Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM is a 100–300mm f/4.5-5.6 zoom. On paper the Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM comes out ahead, 4 advantages to 2, but which one suits you depends on what you shoot.

01

Key differences

From manufacturer specifications

Why is the Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A better than the Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM?

  • Brighter maximum aperture (f/4.5 vs f/4.5-5.6)
  • 20 g lighter (520 g vs 540 g)

Why is the Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM better than the Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A?

  • Longer reach (300mm vs 200mm)
  • 9 mm shorter (121.5 mm vs 130.5 mm long)
  • Focuses 40 cm closer (1.5 m vs 1.9 m)
  • Newer design (1990 vs 1988)
02

Which should you buy?

By use
  • portrait For portrait photography, the Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A has the edge: its f/4.5 aperture gathers more light than f/4.5-5.6.
03

Specification

15 rows · better value flagged ◆
SpecificationCanon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5ACanon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM
Focal length100–200mm 100–300mm
Maximum aperturef/4.5 ◆f/4.5-5.6
Minimum aperturef/32 f/40
Lens typeZoom lens Zoom lens
FormatFull frame Full frame
Weight520 g (18.34 oz) ◆540 g (19.05 oz)
Dimensions74.4 x 130.5 mm 73 x 121.5 mm
Minimum focusing distance1.9 m (74.80 inches) 1.5 m (59.06 inches) ◆
Image stabilization—No
Aperture ring—No
Aperture blades8 8
Optical construction10 elements in 7 groups 13 elements / 10 groups
Filter size58 mm 58 mm
Lens mountCanon EF Canon EF
Released1988 1990
04

Size

Drawn to relative scale
  • A · Canon
  • B · Canon
  • 130.5 × 74.4 mm
  • 121.5 × 73 mm

The Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A is 9 mm longer and 20 g lighter than the Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM.

05

Sample frames

Shot on each lens

Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM

Holly Blue
Holly Blue by transiently permanent 2
Navigasa
Navigasa by transiently permanent 2
Ferns, Studland
Ferns, Studland by transiently permanent 2
The Thin White Line
The Thin White Line by transiently permanent 2
06

Video reviews

4 on YouTube
Video thumbnail for Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A review 1
Video thumbnail for Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A review 2
Video thumbnail for Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM review 1
Video thumbnail for Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM review 2
07

Questions

Which lens has the brighter aperture, the Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A or the Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM?
The Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A opens to f/4.5, against f/4.5-5.6 on the Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM.
Which is lighter, the Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A or the Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM?
The Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A weighs 520 g, 20 g less than the Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM (540 g).
Which focuses closer, the Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A or the Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM?
The Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM focuses down to 1.5 m, against 1.9 m for the Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A.
Is the Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A or the Canon EF 100-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 USM better for portrait photography?
For portrait photography, the Canon EF 100-200 mm f/4.5A has the edge: its f/4.5 aperture gathers more light than f/4.5-5.6.
08

Other comparisons